Home www.nomoretowers.org

**Frederick County Board of Commissioners**
BOCC Letter to PSC Re; Case 9223
Ken Sanders to Jan Gardner
Elected Officials BOCC to PJM Independent Study Request April 02, 2009

Frederick County Board of Commissioners

Elected Officials BOCC to PJM Independent Study Request
April 02, 2009

**State**
Letter to State re FERC
7/12/10 – East Coast Governors Opposition to national transmission policy
7/23/10 – Governor O’Malley’s Executive Order 01.01.2010.16
6/8/10 - Governor Martin O'Malley Announces Offshore Wind Energy Partnership http://www.governor.maryland.gov/pressreleases/100608.asp
6/9/10 – Dominion Virginia Power’s Alternatives for Consideration to Resolve 2015 RTEP Issues
Mid-Atlantic_Governors_Commit_to_Offshore
East_Coast_Governors_Transmission_Letter
Letters to the Governor
Letters to Attorney General
Letters to State Delegates

State

7/12/10 – East Coast Governors Opposition to national transmission policy

7/23/10 – Governor O’Malley’s Executive Order 01.01.2010.16

6/8/10 - Governor Martin O'Malley Announces Offshore Wind Energy Partnership
http://www.governor.maryland.gov/pressreleases/100608.asp

6/9/10 – Dominion Virginia Power’s Alternatives for Consideration to Resolve 2015 RTEP Issues

Mid-Atlantic_Governors_Commit_to_Offshore

East_Coast_Governors_Transmission_Letter

Letters to the Governor

Letters to Attorney General

Letters to State Delegates

**Federal**
7/12/10 - Letter to DOE’s Director Schnagl regarding Clean Air Interstate Rule
April 2010 - US EIA’s Annual Energy Outlook 2010 With Projections to 2035 (U.S. Energy Information Administration, Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting)
Senator Cardin
Senator Mikulsi
Senator Bingaman – Chairman, Senate Energy Committee
Representative Roscoe Bartlett (6th District MD)
Department of Energy
Representative Chris Van Hollen (8th District MD)

Federal

7/12/10 - Letter to DOE’s Director Schnagl regarding Clean Air Interstate Rule

April 2010 - US EIA’s Annual Energy Outlook 2010 With Projections to 2035
(U.S. Energy Information Administration, Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting)

Senator Cardin

Senator Mikulsi

Senator Bingaman – Chairman, Senate Energy Committee

Representative Roscoe Bartlett (6th District MD)

Department of Energy

Representative Chris Van Hollen (8th District MD)

**Letters to PJM**
02/14/2011 Sugarloaf Conservancy's Opposition to Staff's Petition
The Maryland Chamber of Commerce Petition to Intervene - Case 9223
November 24, 2010 State Agenices Letter To Board PJM
7/14/2010 - Revised Liberty Project Proposal
HVDC_Black_&_Veatch_by_PJM.pdf
Sugarloaf Conservancy PJM Communication
Elected Officials BOCC to PJM Independent Study Request 4-2-2009
To Jan Gardner regarding HVDC study” 5/14/09

Letters to PJM

02/14/2011 Sugarloaf Conservancy's Opposition to Staff's Petition

The Maryland Chamber of Commerce Petition to Intervene - Case 9223

November 24, 2010 State Agenices Letter To Board PJM

7/14/2010 - Revised Liberty Project Proposal

HVDC_Black_&_Veatch_by_PJM.pdf

Sugarloaf Conservancy PJM Communication

Elected Officials BOCC to PJM Independent Study Request
4-2-2009

To Jan Gardner regarding HVDC study” 5/14/09

**Maryland Public Service Commission**
Letters To MPSC
Letters From MPSC
7/26/10 - 9223 PATH Application Deemed Complete
7/13/10 - Order Allegheny Power PATH Application - Legal Issues CN9223 Order No. 83469 dealing with the name issue of Potomac Edison with 5% applying for a CPCN to build the PATH Project (attached). They have accepted that Potomac Edison is a proper applicant but reiterated that they will not consider the Company to have filed a complete Second Application “until such time as it files the evidence on which it intends to rely to prove ‘the need for the project in meeting demands for service.’”

Maryland Public Service Commission

Letters To MPSC

Letters From MPSC

7/26/10 - 9223 PATH Application Deemed Complete

7/13/10 - Order Allegheny Power PATH Application - Legal Issues CN9223
Order No. 83469 dealing with the name issue of Potomac Edison with 5% applying for a CPCN to build the PATH Project (attached). They have accepted that Potomac Edison is a proper applicant but reiterated that they will not consider the Company to have filed a complete Second Application “until such time as it files the evidence on which it intends to rely to prove ‘the need for the project in meeting demands for service.’”