|
$257.4 million
in five years - $51.4 million per year - $34.32 per customer per year - $171.60
per customer in 5 years; [AE has
1.5 million customers in their service area]
Aluminum
Conductor Steel Reinforced (ACSR) and other traditional energy cables
utilize a steel wire core around which the aluminum conductor wires are wrapped
– a design originally introduced in 1898.
In
contrast, CTC’s Aluminum Conductor Composite Core – ACCC – cables incorporate a
light-weight advanced composite core around which aluminum conductor wires are
wrapped in a manner identical to traditional energy cable. The composite cores
lighter-weight, smaller size, and enhanced strength and other performance
advantages over traditional steel core allows ACCC to double the current
carrying capacity over existing transmission and distribution cable and
virtually eliminate high-temperature sag.
Aluminum
Conductor Steel Reinforced (ACSR) and other traditional energy cables
utilize a steel wire core around which the aluminum conductor wires are wrapped
– a design originally introduced in 1898.
In
contrast, CTC’s Aluminum Conductor Composite Core – ACCC – cables incorporate a
light-weight advanced composite core around which aluminum conductor wires are
wrapped in a manner identical to traditional energy cable. The composite cores
lighter-weight, smaller size, and enhanced strength and other performance
advantages over traditional steel core allows ACCC to double the current
carrying capacity over existing transmission and distribution cable and
virtually eliminate high-temperature sag.
These performance advantages that address key problems plaguing the utility market and offer significant benefits to electric utility companies and ultimately to their industrial, commercial and residential customers.
Comparison
of the two conductors revealed the following:
When
both conductors were hung and operated at 180°C, the ACCC/TW had a higher
ampacity than Drake.
ACCC/TW carried 1760 amps at 180°C, while Drake carried 1566 amps at the same temperature.
The
U.S. Department of Energy’s National Transmission Grid Study stated “new transmission conductors with composite
cores, as apposed to steel cores, are both lighter and have greater current
carrying capacity, allowing more power to flow in existing rights-of way.”
ACCC
(Aluminum Conductor Composite Core) cable can double the current carrying
capacity over existing transmission and distribution cable and can dramatically
increase system reliability by virtually eliminating high-temperature sag.
ACCC
cable is superior to existing cable such as ACSR and ACSS in a number of key
performance areas.
These performance advantages that address key problems plaguing the utility market and offer significant benefits to electric utility companies and ultimately to their industrial, commercial and residential customers.
James Booker goes on to say the “…CTC conductors will be by far the best designed conductor available for rebuilding of the infrastructure. The savings in wet corona will eventually pay for the cost of the conductors and then keep on saving.”
The
amount of sag in a conductor is influenced by the thermal expansion
coefficent(s) of the material(s) in the conductor. CTC’s composite core in the TransPowr ACCC/TW conductor has an
extremely small coefficient of thermal expansion. Therefore, as the conductor
temperature rises, the sag characteristics of the conductor remains virtually
constant.
We’ll
be looking at ACCC cable benefits in detail throughout this presentation. ACCC cable is superior to existing ACSR and
ACSS cable in a number of key performance areas. These performance advantages address critical problems plaguing
the utility industry and offer significant benefits to electric utility companies
and ultimately to their industrial, commercial, and residential customers. Besides doubling ampacity and virtually
eliminating high-temperature sag, ACCC’s non-metallic core doesn’t contribute
to inductive heating. The annealed
aluminum strand wires in combination with the composite core exhibit excellent
self-damping characteristics.
ACCC/TW
cables are designed to maintain the same overall diameter as conventional ACSR
with a weight slightly lower. The
compact trapezoidal conductors, coupled with a smaller composite core, result
in a TW conductor that has approximate 28% (actually a nominal 28.3% increase)
more aluminum cross-sectional area than ACSR.
The
composite core has up to twice the strength of conventional steel core and will
not rust, corrode or cause electrolysis with aluminum conductors or other
components.
copper loss (I2R
loss) – the power loss in watts due to the
flow of electric current in the
windings of an electrical machine or transformer.
It is equal to the product of the square of the current and the resistance of the winding.
I2R
Loss: Power loss due to electricity power propagation though wire.
Increasing voltage by a factor of 10 decreases line loss by a factor of 100.
As mentioned earlier, the ACCC cables have been subjected to extensive analysis and empirical testing by CTC and several internationally know test organizations. This information has been made available and allows users of PLS-CADD, Sag 10 and other software packages to utilize these industry standard tools in their development programs.
NIn
addition to conventional software tools, CTC has also created a design tool that allows engineering and
administrative personnel to accurately assess the attributes of applying ACCC
technology to their specific project applications.
Inputs
utilize IEEE standard information, such as: Ambient air temperature, wind
speed, emissivity, solar absorption (absorptivity), elevation above sea level,
latitude, time of measurement, line voltage, line mileage, wires/bundle,
conductor details, revenue per kW per demand timing, maximum operating
temperature, percentage of operations at each of three demand situations (base,
intermediate and high/peak).
With this tool, informed design decisions can be made to maximize the utility revenue possibilities with minimum cost and reduced line losses.
In
addition to conventional software tools, CTC has also created a design tool that allows engineering and
administrative personnel to accurately assess the attributes of applying ACCC
technology to their specific project applications.
Inputs
utilize IEEE standard information, such as: Ambient air temperature, wind
speed, emissivity, solar absorption (absorptivity), elevation above sea level,
latitude, time of measurement, line voltage, line mileage, wires/bundle,
conductor details, revenue per kW per demand timing, maximum operating
temperature, percentage of operations at each of three demand situations (base,
intermediate and high/peak).
With this tool, informed design decisions can be made to maximize the utility revenue possibilities with minimum cost and reduced line losses.
In
addition to conventional software tools, CTC has also created a design tool that allows engineering and
administrative personnel to accurately assess the attributes of applying ACCC
technology to their specific project applications.
Inputs
utilize IEEE standard information, such as: Ambient air temperature, wind
speed, emissivity, solar absorption (absorptivity), elevation above sea level,
latitude, time of measurement, line voltage, line mileage, wires/bundle, conductor
details, revenue per kW per demand timing, maximum operating temperature,
percentage of operations at each of three demand situations (base, intermediate
and high/peak).
With this tool, informed design decisions can be made to maximize the utility revenue possibilities with minimum cost and reduced line losses.
In
addition to conventional software tools, CTC has also created a design tool that allows engineering and
administrative personnel to accurately assess the attributes of applying ACCC
technology to their specific project applications.
Inputs
utilize IEEE standard information, such as: Ambient air temperature, wind
speed, emissivity, solar absorption (absorptivity), elevation above sea level,
latitude, time of measurement, line voltage, line mileage, wires/bundle,
conductor details, revenue per kW per demand timing, maximum operating
temperature, percentage of operations at each of three demand situations (base,
intermediate and high/peak).
With this tool, informed design decisions can be made to maximize the utility revenue possibilities with minimum cost and reduced line losses.
Quiz:
East coast power outage on August 14, 2003 – 61,000 MW of power – 50 million
people impacted – economic loss of over $4 billion – over heated line due to
grounding out on a tree.
If
Allegheny Energy looks at ONLY the simple Return on Investment (ROI)
without completing a full analysis of ACCC/TW technology and the long-term
benefits to the rate payers,
they
are not fulfilling their fiduciary responsibilities to Maryland rate-payers as
required by the Public Service Commission and
they
will be adding to the already immense financial burden rate-payers are facing
with their short-sighted decisions.
Remember:
The
U.S. Department of Energy’s National Transmission Grid Study stated “new transmission conductors with composite
cores, as apposed to steel cores, are both lighter and have greater current
carrying capacity, allowing more power to flow in existing rights-of way.”
ACCC
(Aluminum Conductor Composite Core) cable can double the current carrying
capacity over existing transmission and distribution cable and can dramatically
increase system reliability by virtually eliminating high-temperature sag.
ACCC
cable is superior to existing cable such as ACSR and ACSS in a number of key
performance areas.
These performance advantages that address key problems plaguing the utility market and offer significant benefits to electric utility companies and ultimately to their industrial, commercial and residential customers. |